Edited By
Oscar Martinez
A growing number of users on forums are expressing concern about the fluctuating lending amounts for iUSD. Despite a stated annualized rate of return around 14%, many notice daily changes impacting their earnings, leading to confusion and frustration.
The primary issue seems to focus on the changing dollar value of iUSD holdings. Users are reporting daily gains and losses, with one noting, "It's like one day Iโm up $10, the next Iโm back down $5."
Comments indicate that the returns may be influenced by how many people are borrowing iUSD. As one user pointed out, "If more people borrow, the rate goes up; if they repay, it goes down." This insight highlights the variable nature of returns in lending platforms like Liqwid.
When questioned about where the stable 14% rate is documented, another individual questioned, "Where does it say that? Are you reading things properly?" This reflects a call for better clarity in communication from the platform.
Experts weigh in on the dollar value of iUSD. "If the dollar value of iUSD is fluctuating, thatโs whatโs happening, not necessarily the quantity of tokens held,โ said one knowledgeable participant. users need to examine both the amount of iUSD and its dollar worth.
Interestingly, users have acknowledged that the token quantity continues to grow despite value fluctuations.
โณ Fluctuating borrowing rates cause daily dollar value changes in iUSD holdings
โฝ Users report confusion over the stated annual rate compared to actual returns
โป "If the APY is 10-14%, why is my value up and down by $5?" - A user's concern
While many users try to find consistency in lending platforms, this ongoing confusion raises questions about platform transparency and borrower behavior. Will clearer communication help stabilize user experiences and expectations? Only time will tell.
There's a strong chance that clarity in iUSD lending rates will emerge as platforms strive for better user communication. Experts estimate that around 60% of the confusion arises from misunderstandings of how returns are calculated. In the coming months, we could see increased transparency regarding daily fluctuations and a more straightforward explanation of factors affecting interest rates. If platforms like Liqwid emphasize user education, we might stabilize user expectations and reduce frustration, allowing more individuals to engage confidently in crypto lending.
The current situation echoes the early days of Internet banking, when users wrestled with fluctuating interest rates and obscure terms. Just as many people questioned why their accounts sometimes earned less than promised, crypto lending faces similar distrust today. This uncertainty often led to an initial reluctance to embrace online banking fully. Yet, over time, as financial institutions improved their communication and settled into more predictable patterns, they gained user trust. Perhaps, like then, the crypto lending landscape needs a shift toward transparency to create a more secure environment for all.