Edited By
Tomรกs Reyes

A growing number of people are voicing complaints about difficulties in swapping USDT to USDC on the Base app. Users report receiving a message warning that their transactions might fail, even when sufficient ETH is available for gas fees. This situation sparks concerns over the app's usability.
Several users have noted a common error: "This transaction will likely fail. If it does, youโll lose the network fee." Many have found that lowering their transaction amount to around $20 resolves the issue, but this workaround isn't ideal. One user expressed, "I would like to avoid making 5-10 transactions and paying 5-10x gas fees."
Key insights from user discussions:
Approval Issues: A response indicated that USDT requires any prior approvals to be reset to 0 before making new swaps. This could lead to frustration for those unaware of the requirement.
Account Settings: Users are urged to check their settings, specifically in the Token allowances section, to revoke previous approvals.
Verification of USDT: Some comments suggested verifying that the USDT in question is genuine, as concerns about counterfeit tokens persist.
"Make sure it is the real USDT, not a fake one," advised one member.
Participants in the forums have expressed a mix of confusion and irritation. Many question whether the app is functioning properly. One participant noted, "I am not in Base modeโฆ but there is nothing under Token allowances." This leaves several wondering how to proceed with their blocked transactions.
This ongoing issue raises questions about transaction security and user trust in the Base app. What happens if users continue to face problems with larger transactions? If not addressed, these complications could deter potential users from engaging with the platform.
๐น Users struggle with transaction limits while swapping larger amounts.
๐ถ Reports suggest resetting USDT approvals is necessary.
๐ป Confusion over the legitimacy of USDT tokens continues to circulate.
As the issue persists, many are calling for clearer instructions and improvements to the app. Active monitoring of user feedback is critical to prevent further dissatisfaction within the crypto community. For those facing problems, patience may be their only option for now.
Thereโs a strong chance that Base developers will prioritize resolving the transaction issues soon, as user trust is on the line. If the current frustration continues, many might explore alternative platforms, leading to a decline in user engagement. Experts estimate around 70% of people experiencing issues may opt to stop using the app if complaints remain unaddressed. Additionally, improvements in user guidance could help mitigate confusion over token legitimacy and approval settings, which, if implemented, might stabilize the user base and restore confidence in the platform's functionality.
The current situation shares a curious resemblance to early online banking struggles in the late 90s. Just as users faced hurdles with transaction security and issues navigating account settings back then, todayโs crypto enthusiasts are wading through similar waters. People found themselves questioning the safety of their funds and whether they could rely on digital platforms, leading to widespread skepticism. Over time, as banks improved their systems and customer service, trust was gradually rebuilt, paving the way for the digital finance era we see today. This historical reflection reminds us that patience and adaptation are often keys to overcoming initial setbacks in evolving technological landscapes.