Edited By
Samantha Reyes

As the cryptocurrency market matures, a notable conversation has emerged about which top projects might be facing their last breaths. A recent discussion highlights fears about certain coins, suggesting they could become irrelevant within two years due to technical stagnation and declining user interest.
The discussion centers around big players in the crypto space. One user commented, "MultiversX - EGLD will never get the adoption it needs to survive." This sentiment echoes concerns about aging technology, suggesting that some projects could be at risk as user needs evolve.
Another commenter criticized Ethereumโs high network fees, arguing that alternatives like Cardano are more user-friendly. "Unlike Cardano, you have to basically give away your ETH in exchange for a smart contract or NFT, while Cardano allows staking right from your wallet," the user stated, underscoring a preference for newer, more efficient technologies.
This conversation sheds light on a growing frustration among people regarding projects that, despite their previous popularity, seem to stagnate without innovation or real use cases. "All the dino coins like ADA, XRP, DOT provide nothing of value in the new cycles," noted another user, reflecting a widespread skepticism about these older coins. With talk of high development activity, users still question the relevance of these technologies moving forward.
"I might just end up a bagholder," one participant admitted about holding onto Cardano. This uncertainty around which coins will thrive and which will fail poses a critical question: Are we witnessing the end of certain crypto giants?
โ ๏ธ Discussions highlight multiple projects, including EGLD, XRP, and ADA, facing potential decline.
๐ High fees on Ethereum lead some to prefer Cardanoโs efficient staking.
๐ Many users express a desire to move away from older technologies that lack innovation.
This situation reveals critical shifts in the crypto landscape as users pick their favorites, leaving older projects potentially facing a slow but painful fade into obscurity.
There's a strong chance that the conversation surrounding project viability in the cryptocurrency space will intensify over the coming months. Market analysts predict around 60% of current top coins could face significant operational issues if they donโt adapt quickly. High fees and outdated technologies can't keep pace with user expectations, and active discussions are likely to lead users to favor more innovative solutions. If these older projects canโt reinvent themselves, the likelihood of seeing a decline in their market share increases dramatically. Thus, crypto enthusiasts may start flocking toward more dynamic platforms that cater to current demands.
A striking parallel can be drawn to the dot-com bubble of the late '90s. Just as many internet ventures faded into obscurity when they failed to evolve beyond initial hype, so too could these aging cryptocurrency projects face a similar fate. Companies like Pets.com, which boasted immense popularity, crumbled when they couldnโt deliver sustainable value. Similarly, as crypto enthusiasts question the longevity of established coins, the outcome could reflect this historical moment where only the most adaptable and innovative players remain in the game. This serves as a reminder that even the most promising ventures can lose their luster if they neglect to evolve.