A growing coalition of people is raising alarms about staking SOL on exchanges, with fresh debates suggesting risks and missed opportunities. New insights hint that alternative methods may provide safer staking options.
The debate about staking on centralized platforms intensifies, fueled by concerns that it may suppress SOL's price and dilute its value. One forum member claimed, "If you do bonded staking, you earn 6-10% rewards. Plus, if hacked, you get three days to sort it out before you get drained." This adds another layer to the ongoing discussion about risks associated with traditional staking methods.
While many favor the convenience of exchanges, some people remain skeptical. One commenter stated, "I received part of my PENGU airdrop just for staking with Helius." This reflects a sentiment where staking may have benefits beyond just rewards.
However, critiques persist. Another participant argued against common perceptions, remarking, "Donโt believe this bs; this is a common scam." Many feel thereโs a dire need for comprehensive education around reputable staking methods.
In the search for better options, some participants propose moving to JupSOL for a higher APY of 9%. Users are becoming increasingly interested in self-custodial wallets and hardware wallets like Ledger and Trezor for greater asset protection.
Interestingly, the mention of sniper bots has rekindled interest, as some users tout significantly better returns compared to traditional staking. One user shared, "I donโt stake my SOL; I run a sniper bot with it. The ROI is 400-500%." This perspective signifies a shift in strategy for some community members.
โ ๏ธ Critics warn that traditional staking can suppress market prices.
โ "If youโre staking thousands of dollars, then you buy a Ledger. Much safer than an exchange."
๐ Increased interest in higher APY options is paving the way for alternatives.