Home
/
Security measures
/
Wallet security
/

Is sharing your xpub with an api safe and smart?

Privacy Concerns Spark Debate Over Sharing XPUB with APIs | Users Weigh in

By

Sophie Chang

Feb 14, 2026, 01:04 PM

Edited By

Clara Meier

2 minutes reading time

Illustration showing the relationship between Bitcoin XPUB and public APIs, highlighting privacy concerns and self-hosting solutions.

A growing conversation is emerging among Bitcoin holders regarding the security of sharing extended public keys (XPUB) with third-party APIs. With 2026 underway, many are drifting toward self-hosted solutions to safeguard their portfolios, but the questions loom: Is it safe? What risks might arise?

The Rise of Self-Hosted Solutions

More people are opting for self-hosted portfolio trackers instead of relying on third-party services. A user contemplated sending their XPUB to the Blockstream API, believing it keeps privacy intact since it doesn't require an API key or user account.

"Youโ€™ll gonna ruin your privacy. Run your own node instead," cautioned one commenter, emphasizing concerns about exposing wallet activity.

Understanding the Risks

Critics highlight that while an XPUB is a view-only key for deriving wallet addresses, it could still map out a user's entire transaction history. One comment noted, "An XPUB is not spendable, but itโ€™s extremely identifying. If privacy matters, donโ€™t share/publish XPUBs for wallets you want to keep unlinkable."

Responses from the Community

Forums are abuzz with differing opinions:

  • Run your own node: Many suggest connecting wallets directly to a personal node for enhanced privacy.

  • API Usage: Some debate the implications of using services like Blockstream, arguing it may lead to data exposure.

  • Address Gaps: A few propose a method of deriving addresses from the XPUB with gaps to search for UTXOs without risking privacy.

"An XPUB could expose all past and future activity, especially as new addresses are used."

Key Insights

  • โ—ผ๏ธ Users advocate for direct connections to personal nodes as a safer option.

  • โ—ฝ Many express skepticism toward third-party API interactions.

  • ๐Ÿ“Œ "This sets a dangerous precedent" - A userโ€™s warning about privacy risks.

In the world of crypto, privacy remains paramount. As discussions unfold, Bitcoin holders must navigate emerging technologies while weighing the risks associated with sharing vital wallet data.

Future Implications for Bitcoin Holders

Expect more Bitcoin holders to shift to self-hosted solutions as they become increasingly aware of the privacy risks tied to sharing XPUBs. With experts estimating around a 70% probability that these concerns will intensify, itโ€™s likely that innovations in personal node management will emerge to meet this rising need for security. As security protocols evolve, an increasing number may lean towards multi-signature wallets or even decentralization of tracking methods to shield their transaction histories. In this environment of caution, it's clear that the community will prioritize methods that enhance anonymity and control over their financial data.

A Historical Echo

This crypto privacy debate draws an interesting parallel to the early days of digital banking when many hesitated to adopt online transactions over security fears. Just as consumers eventually favored encrypted connections and secure payment gateways, todayโ€™s Bitcoin users may similarly come to embrace reliable self-hosted methods. The evolution from skepticism to acceptance in financial transactions suggests that in time, the crypto community will find a technological balance that not only protects individual privacy but also promotes mainstream adoption without compromising trust.