A heated dispute has erupted over the auction of a 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer Evo 9, where the winning bidder faces an unexpected demand for an extra $3,000. After winning the vehicle for $25,750, the buyer is now being asked to pay $29,000 to finalize the sale, raising serious concerns about seller accountability in online transactions.
After winning the bid, the buyer encountered pushback from the seller, who expressed dissatisfaction with the sale price. The buyer stated, "If I give him $29,000, we can meet and finalize the deal." This demand follows the auction being tagged as "No Reserve," typically meaning the vehicle should sell for the highest bid. The buyer reported the seller's inflated demands to the auction platform, providing screenshots as evidence.
Comments from various forums reveal mixed feelings about the situation:
Caution Advised: Some people warned the buyer about the seller's behavior, stating, "Sellers like that who donโt play by the rules are probably shady in their presentation of their cars!"
Legal Concerns: Others pointed out that pursuing legal action might be futile, with one comment noting, "Thereโs nothing a lawyer can do."
Moving On: Many urged the buyer to cut losses, with one user suggesting, "Just walk away from this deal."
Interestingly, several commenters have raised alarm over the auction's integrity, advising others to stay away from the seller. One noted, "Looks like the seller has posted it on Facebook now. Please share this with anyone you know looking to buy an Evo. Stay away and report it as a scam if you can!"
Another mentioned, "Anyone who breathes like that in a video is bad news. Definitely walk away."
The recent tensions have sparked an influx of discussions about expectations in online auctions. Many commenters emphasized that sudden price increases shouldn't happen, stating, "That isnโt how auctions work."
Amid heightened skepticism, one user highlighted the woes of the buyer, summarizing, "This has regret written all over it."
"Chances are you dodged a bullet!" - remarks one forum user on the salvage title controversy.
Experts warn that sudden demands like these could erode trust in online auctions. Discussions have centered around understanding the buyer's rights in this predicament.
The buyer has options to either reject the seller's extra cash demand or possibly seek legal action. Analysts believe there might be a supportive ruling for the buyer due to the auction's "No Reserve" classification. However, if the buyer chooses to withdraw, finding a comparable vehicle may prove difficult, especially given the Evo 9's popularity.
โฝ Comments reveal a significant distrust in seller practices.
๐ก Many suggest reporting the seller to maintain auction integrity.
๐ โHeโs a shady seller, report himโ - a top comment from concerned individuals.
This unfolding story shows how disputes can shake buyer confidence in online auction formats, echoing past concerns across various markets.
As this saga continues, many watch closely, asking how auction platforms will adapt to uphold buyer protections. Who will the scales tip in favor of?