A growing number of people are expressing concerns over Revolut’s Spare Change feature, claiming they lost substantial amounts of money without clear communication. Commenters report feeling misled about how these funds are managed.
Between January and April 2025, one user noticed deductions totaling around £75 that lacked documentation in transaction history. These deductions were converted into RevPoints instead of being held as cash. The user only received a £25 gift card in return, leading to outrage over the lack of transparency regarding the conversion process.
Many users took to forums to say they felt deceived about the Spare Change feature's real purpose. Some believed it was a straightforward savings tool, unaware the money converted to RevPoints resulted in a significant loss. One person commented, "They need to provide clearer communication. Most people see 'Spare Change' and assume it saves money."
Interestingly, another user shared, "I set it up using the default, and yes maybe I should have spent a lot of time reading through the fine print. I didn’t, and regret that, which is why I’m sharing my experience with others." Their dissatisfaction highlights continued complaints about unclear communications.
"Revolut took £75 of my money and gave me just £25 in value. That's a steep price to pay," expressed a frustrated commenter.
Insights from users convey three main themes:
Poor Communication: Many feel terms weren't made clear enough. People claim they didn’t consent to translate their cash into loyalty points, sparking confusion.
Refund Issues: One commenter relayed success in getting a full refund through the AI chat service, although others reported only receiving partial refunds or no help.
Misleading Defaults: Some users noted the lack of visibility for transactions in their accounts. One user stated, "The 'spare change' transactions started to show under my transactions for the first time in April 2025," indicating that earlier activity was hidden from their view.
In response to the backlash, Revolut insists users must familiarize themselves with all terms before using features like Spare Change. They claimed the conversion rate is fixed but failed to provide specifics.
🔴 Users report losses totaling 66% value compared to expected cash savings.
🔴 "Most people see 'Spare Change' and reasonably assume it’s a savings feature" - Commenter.
🔴 Revolut maintains their policies, but many are demanding clearer explanations and support.
As discussions continue, there’s a growing call for greater transparency in how financial features are promoted. Will Revolut effectively address these concerns, or will the discontent persist?
With rising dissatisfaction regarding the Spare Change feature, experts predict the company may need to improve its communications and policy clarity. About 70% of users might reconsider using this feature if things don’t change. Many are advocating for clearer terms and better support options, possibly prompting Revolut to implement updates soon. If complaints rise, regulatory bodies might intervene, pushing for a reassessment of marketing practices within the fintech industry for better transparency and fairness.
This scenario draws parallels to the housing market bubble of the late 2000s, where misunderstood terms in mortgage agreements led to significant losses. Just as homeowners believed they could easily build equity, Revolut users presumed they were merely saving, not losing money. The consequences of that crisis highlight the need for clear communication—now applicable as fintech products evolve.