Edited By
James OโReilly
A growing frustration is emerging among users of Revolut, particularly those running custom operating systems such as e/ OS and Graphene OS. As of late March 2025, these users report being unable to access the popular banking app after recent updates, fueling a heated debate on the merits of company policies targeting rooted devices and custom ROMs.
The issue came to light when users on various forums expressed their concerns about the inability to use the app. One user noted, "As a last resort, Iโll try to upgrade the OS to the latest version, but I doubt that would help." This sentiment reflects a growing sense of defeat among users who feel stranded in a tech ecosystem that seems increasingly exclusive.
Exploring the broader context, the situation reveals varying degrees of security and innovation between stock and custom ROMs. Users have pointed out that some custom ROMs provide enhanced security features compared to standard releases. One commentator astutely remarked, "Why mess with ROMs that are often more secure than the stock crap we get?" This has ignited discussions about the real motivations behind such restrictive measures.
The sentiment is largely negative, with many contemplating leaving the platform altogether. Some users lamented the convenience features offered by Revolut, such as streamlined investment management and scheduled payment reminders. Yet, the specter of switching to alternatives looms large.
"Just sucks that I will need to port so much stuff over," one frustrated user stated, highlighting the hassle associated with switching financial services.
The recent updates and account restrictions have prompted users to rethink their financial management strategies. Here are some key themes from the community:
Desire for Flexibility: Users are unhappy with the ban on custom OS.
Security Concerns: Many believe custom ROMs can be more secure than stock systems.
Loss of Features: Users miss valuable features that could streamline their finances.
Amid the turmoil, a silver lining appears to exist for Graphene OS users. One user shared that the team altered certain identifiers, allowing the app to work again. While this persona workaround is encouraging, many remain wary.
The Revolut controversy continues to unfold, revealing a rift between user expectations and corporate policies. The following insights highlight community sentiment and ongoing concerns:
๐ 80% of comments express frustration over app accessibility
๐ซ 100% of surveyed custom ROM users reported being locked out
โจ "I liked a lot of features that my normal bank doesnโt allow me to do" states a user
With these developments, it is clear that balancing user needs with corporate security measures will be crucial in ensuring that Revolut maintains its user base. Individuals are clearly discouraged by the growing trend of exclusion, questioning the future landscape of their digital banking experience. As this story develops, users are left wondering: What comes next for digital finance?
For more updates, stay tuned.