Home
/
Community insights
/
User opinions
/

Seeking community feedback on past catalyst proposal

Cardano Enthusiast Seeks Community Feedback for New Catalyst Proposal | Aiming to Fix Past Mistakes

By

James Williams

Feb 10, 2026, 07:58 PM

Edited By

Omar El-Sayed

2 minutes reading time

A data scientist looking for community input on a project proposal, standing in front of a whiteboard filled with notes and charts, encouraging discussion among a small group of people.

A data scientist, long-time supporter of Cardano, is rallying for community input after a previous proposal fell flat. With plans for a revised submission, the hope is to sharpen focus and gain traction in the next funding round.

Context of the Proposal

Despite a well-thought-out project aimed at addressing local and global needs, the original proposal to Fund 14 of Catalyst was turned down. The team is eager to understand what resonates with the community for a more successful resubmission.

Community's Insightful Critiques

Feedback from people on forums has highlighted key areas for improvement:

  • Narrow Focus: "The problem is framed too broadly." The initial feedback suggests starting with a specific farmer pain point before expanding to broader system benefits.

  • Regulatory Concerns: Acknowledging technical dependencies, comments noted a potential reluctance from voters due to regulatory concerns. One user remarked, "Clarify the value if regulators arenโ€™t involved."

  • NFT Clarity: Thereโ€™s skepticism about the rationale behind NFTs in the proposal. Users encourage a simpler explanation to better connect with the audience.

Interestingly, one commenter stated, "The concept and team are strong. It seems more like a narrative miss than a technical shortfall." This highlights the importance of clear storytelling in project pitches.

Future Directions

In response to the constructive feedback, the project team aims to refine their narrative. A sharper focus on specific solutions and the beneficiaries is on the table. One member stated, "Finding a more specific pain point wonโ€™t be a problem!"

"Weโ€™ll think through those points and rework the project narrative."

As they prepare for the next round, the challenge remains: how to effectively communicate their vision and engage more voters?

Key Highlights

  • โ–ณ Feedback: Voters want specific, relatable pain points addressed.

  • โ–ฝ Regulatory Lock-in: Concerns over complexities tied to dependencies on external systems.

  • โ€ป "A tighter story around a single killer use case could do much better next fund."

This ongoing dialogue showcases the dynamic nature of project proposals within the Cardano community, urging a concerted push for clarity and relevance that resonates with potential supporters.

Forecasting Community Response

Given the constructive feedback from forums, thereโ€™s a strong chance the revised proposal will see significant improvements in its reception. If the project team effectively narrows its focus to specific farmer pain points and clearly outlines regulatory implications, it could boost community support by around 70%. Additionally, simplifying the narrative around NFT usage might alleviate skepticism and draw in those who were cautious before. As the next funding round approaches, intellect and clarity could push the proposal to a more favorable standing.

Echoes of the Past

In examining similar situations, the evolution of mobile app development in the early 2010s comes to mind. Many developers launched too broadly, neglecting niche markets that ultimately became critical drivers of success. By tightening their focus on specific user needs and stories, they transformed significant setbacks into sector-leading successes. Just as these app creators found their footing through connection and clarity, the Cardano project team has a similar opportunity to rewrite its narrative and connect with the community in a meaningful way.