Home
/
Community insights
/
User opinions
/

User seeks recovery of $om tokens sent to wrong mexc address

User Appeals for Help | Token Recovery Controversy Erupts on MEXC

By

Rajesh Gupta

Mar 26, 2025, 09:38 PM

2 minutes reading time

Visual representation of cryptocurrency recovery with a distressed user and digital tokens

An urgent plea for assistance from a MEXC user reveals a potential issue with token deposits on the platform, raising questions about MEXC's recovery policies. On March 26, 2025, a frustrated user reached out to the r/MEXC_official community seeking guidance after their $OM tokens were allegedly deemed "burned" by customer support, sparking a heated debate within the crypto community.

What Happened?

The user sent Mantra ($OM) tokens via the Binance Smart Chain (BSC) to an address that they believed belonged to MEXC. However, after realizing the blunder of not bridging the tokens first, they were informed by MEXC support that the assets were unrecoverable.

"These tokens are burned," support reportedly stated, invoking a common fear among crypto tradersโ€”loss of assets through missteps. But many in the community argue that if the tokens remain visible on BscScan, hope for their recovery still exists.

Community Response

In an atmosphere of mixed sentiment, members of the r/MEXC_official forum bounced around ideas. Some feel helpless; they express that attempts to get MEXC's attention have been disheartening. One user noted, "I have tried and got no response." On the other hand, optimism pervades the screen as others share success stories, with one mentioning recovery after a similar incident.

"This sets a dangerous precedent if they canโ€™t retrieve tokens stuck due to a network error," a concerned community member stated.

Users expressed a combination of caution and resolve. It's became clear that the need for clarity on MEXC's recovery capabilities is urgent. Observations reveal that as many sympathize with the user, they question MEXC's customer service process.

MEXC's Recovery Policy + DEX+ Capabilities

The core of the issue lies in MEXC's own guidelines. According to the platformโ€™s support page, there is a procedure for recovering deposits made on unsupported networks, but it requires detailed identity verification and a submission processโ€”inviting skepticism as users wonder about its effectiveness. Community members recognize that the ability of MEXC to manage assets via their DEX+ feature could provide a pathway to resolving such mishaps. After all, if $OM is listed on BSC, why canโ€™t MEXC tap into that?

Some experts feel hopeful noting that previous recoveries show potential for user support from customer service.

Key Learnings

  • ๐Ÿ” MEXC claims burning occurs for incorrect network deposits.

  • ๐ŸŒ The community is split; some had previous successes with token recovery.

  • โšก User experiences highlight a need for better support responsiveness.

MEXC has yet to respond to the userโ€™s ongoing request for help.

As discussions expand across the community, many are left wondering--how can they ensure smoother future transactions? The ongoing conversation on recovery may affect user trust in MEXC's operational integrity.

For more information about MEXC's support, you can check their official support page.

Stay tuned as this story develops and users continue to explore what the future holds for unresolved crypto errors on major exchanges.