Home
/
Market analysis
/
Crypto trends
/

Analysis: qubic assault on xmr monero not a 51% attack

Analyzing the Qubic Situation | Miscommunication or Market Manipulation?

By

Nicolas Dupont

Aug 17, 2025, 05:36 AM

Edited By

Omar El-Sayed

Updated

Aug 17, 2025, 09:33 PM

2 minutes reading time

Illustration showing the impact of exchange tactics on Monero's market, with charts and Monero logos
popular

A growing concern surrounds Monero's XMR as the Qubic situation ignites furious debates in the crypto community. Many argue that the so-called Qubic attack is merely a tactic to spread disinformation and manipulate market prices rather than a legitimate 51% threat.

Current Developments in the Qubic Controversy

Recent discussions from Monero Talk's Episode 227 highlight the issue of misleading narratives about the Qubic situation. Major sources like Cointelegraph have been criticized for echoing incorrect information, while TheBlock stands out for its more nuanced insights into the situation.

What Community Members Are Saying

Forum comments show strong sentiments about the controversy. Some users suspect that exchanges might be leveraging the Qubic narrative to create Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD), with one stating, "They just wanted to spread FUD so they can crash the price."

A user recently raised an interesting point: "If they would continuously control the network, then they could for example revert a transaction. If they can prove that they did this, it would be a 51% attack." They further clarified the implications of a 51% attack, emphasizing the meaning behind different chain reorganizations. Another comment highlighted a fresh observation from today, August 17, suggesting that a 9-chain reorganization went largely unnoticed by the wider community.

Interestingly, several community members express a mix of frustration and concern about the impact on trading exchanges. With Monero withdrawal limits enforced, they draw parallels to the Monerun incident. As one participant noted, "It's a 30%+ attack with selfish mining and market disruption."

Breakdown of Key Themes from the Discussion

Three main themes emerge from the evolving dialogue:

  1. FUD Manipulation: Many believe the Qubic attack is a coordinated FUD initiative by exchanges to suppress prices.

  2. Nature of the Attack: Users are uncertain whether the event is a genuine threat or a lot of noise.

  3. Risk of Financial Loss: Thereโ€™s a noticeable insistence that users will not face significant losses due to potential market manipulation.

"This isnโ€™t a solid attack; itโ€™s just flexing for publicity," shared one concerned community member.

Key Points to Consider

  • โ–ณ Community speculates on hidden exchanges' motives regarding the Qubic story.

  • โ–ฝ Market manipulation fears are rampant, tied to trading platform practices.

  • โ€ป "We are definitely not being told the full story," echoed another participant.

As discussions evolve, many hope to uncover more truths behind the Qubic incident, especially concerning the potential misinformation tactics from exchanges. Users remain optimistic about a possible recovery in Monero's trading activities, despite fears of significant losses for traders, which could attract regulatory scrutiny in the future.

A Paradoxical Reflection

This situation oddly reflects past sports scandals, like the infamous โ€œBlack Sox Scandal,โ€ calling into question the underlying integrity of the crypto space. Trust, once eroded, demands significant effort to restore. The potential fallout from the Qubic incident challenges stakeholders to enhance transparency and address mutual concerns within the Monero community.