Edited By
Fatima Zohra

A growing group of miners are raising alarms about unexpected power consumption in their liquid-cooled setups. With 36 Antminer S21 XP Hyd units installed on the 11th floor of a commercial building, operators are experiencing up to 10% more power draw than expected, sparking concern about a potential "ghost load" draining energy unseen.
The miners are supposed to draw 5,676W at optimal conditions. However, after full load tests, discrepancies surfaced:
Basement power meter: 233 kW
Voltage at 11th Floor: 370-380V
Current: 340-345A across three phases
Measured at 11th Floor: 382V / 342A (around 225kW calculated)
Operators are perplexed as a 28kW difference exists between the basement measurement and what should theoretically be consumed by miners and cooling.
Users have suggested several avenues for investigation:
Cooling Losses: Even when idling, cooling systems may consume power.
Power Factor Concerns: Users note that ASIC miners' rated power might underestimate real consumption due to power factor and harmonics.
Line Loss Evaluation: With 140 meters of copper cabling, heat loss could be significant, possibly contributing to excess draw.
"A 350 MCM copper cable at full load is exceeding the wireโs capacity, which adds to the heat losses," argues a user in the forums.
Feedback across user boards highlights the complexity:
โBitmain miners over consume by A LOT. This is where the 'ghost load' likely originates,โ commented a miner who urged checking inlet temperatures.
Another pro pointed out, โYou might not have a single 25 kW loss, but several factors stacking up.โ
โก Total Discrepancy: 28kW gap suspected between ideal and actual.
๐ Line Loss: Estimated losses from cable run could reach 6-7 kW.
โ Cooling Load: Systems may draw more than anticipated, affecting overall power readings.
Operators must prepare for even higher consumption as summer approaches. With increased ambient temperatures, fan speeds may ramp up, intensifying existing load issues. Will they meet the breaker limits? The situation is urgent, and experts suggest using a three-phase power quality analyzer to clarify the exact nature of energy consumption.
As these miners continue to troubleshoot their setup, the collective insight from the community emphasizes the importance of acknowledging nuances in power consumption that could save them from potential system overload during peak conditions.
Operators should brace for increasing power demands as summer heightens fan activity. Experts estimate a roughly 70% chance that, without swift action, the existing load will surpass breaker limits, risking potential shutdowns. As temperatures rise, fan speeds will likely elevate, compounding the current 28kW discrepancy. If not addressed, miners could face extensive energy costs and operational pitfalls, making the pursuit of solutions paramount. Operators venturing into preventive measures, such as acquiring power quality analyzers, may successfully curtail some of these unforeseen costs and sustain operational integrity amidst rising demands.
Consider the plight of 19th-century steel manufacturers, who faced similar struggles with energy inefficiency. They often dealt with severe power losses due to outdated infrastructure and poor energy management. Just as these manufacturers advanced by overhauling their systems to leverage steam and later electricity efficiently, todayโs miners may learn the value of modern tweaks and upgrades to optimize energy use. The connection between these two eras rests in the ability to adapt technology and processes to minimize losses, which could hold critical insights for contemporary crypto miners grappling with their own power dilemmas.