Home
/
News updates
/
Latest news
/

Polygon and sonic labs founders criticize ethereum foundation

Polygon and Sonic Labs Co-Founders Criticize Ethereum Foundation | Tensions Rise Over Support

By

Yui Tanaka

Oct 21, 2025, 04:26 PM

Edited By

Liam O'Brien

2 minutes reading time

Co-founders of Polygon and Sonic Labs speaking at a conference, expressing concerns about Ethereum Foundation's leadership.
popular

A strong voice from the Polygon camp has surfaced as co-founder Sandeep Nailwal publicly criticized the Ethereum Foundation for its lack of support for the layer-two scaling solution. Nailwal's frustration highlights a growing disconnect between innovative projects and foundation backing.

Context of the Conflict

In a series of comments, Nailwal expressed disappointment over the limited recognition of Polygon's significant contributions to Ethereum's ecosystem. He stated that if Polygon operated independently, its market value would likely surge higher. This sentiment was mirrored by Andre Cronje, co-founder of Sonic Labs, who noted an uneven level of support for developers within the crypto sphere.

Responses from the Ethereum Community

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin acknowledged Polygon's advancements, suggesting that future collaboration may revolve around zero-knowledge (ZK) technology.

"It's quite pathetic that loyalty is questioned because our coin can't catch a bid," one forum member commented, indicating the frustrations within the community regarding project support. Others elicited deeper discourse, questioning the financial futures of both Polygon and Ethereum.

Key Points from Discussions

  • Support Discrepancy: Nailwal and Cronje raised concerns about inadequate backing from the Ethereum Foundation despite Polygon's achievements.

  • Market Value Speculations: Discussions surfaced about Polygon's rebranding from MATIC to POL, with skepticism surrounding the tokenomics change and market performance.

  • Community Sentiments: Comments reflected a mixed sentiment, with some labeling Ethereum as a "shitcoin" while others defended its technological capabilities.

"How many projects has Andre Cronje started then ditched since 2020?"

Key Insights

  • ๐Ÿ”ฅ Polygon's Contribution: Polygon's scaling solutions have significantly enhanced Ethereum's efficiency.

  • ๐Ÿ“‰ Token Transition Backlash: The switch from MATIC to POL has not fared well in the current market cycle.

  • ๐Ÿ‘ Future Collaboration?: Buterinโ€™s openness to future collaborations could pave the way for enhanced partnerships in crypto development.

With the landscape continuously shifting, will Ethereum's support catch up with innovative projects like Polygon? The ongoing conversations signal a need for stronger alliances among developers.

Expectations for the Road Ahead

Thereโ€™s a strong chance that as the crypto community continues to evolve, weโ€™ll see Ethereum ramping up its support for projects like Polygon. Given the competitive landscape, estimates suggest that there is around a 70% likelihood of increased collaboration in the next year as the Ethereum Foundation recognizes the importance of maintaining robust partnerships. The potential integration of zero-knowledge technology could finalize this shift, harnessing the strengths of both entities to solidify their standings in an ever-changing market. If executed effectively, such moves could not only stabilize Polygon's market value but also enhance scalability for Ethereum, making it an attractive option for developers and people alike.

A Lesson from the Silver Screen

Reflecting on the past, the tension between innovation and established interests can be likened to the story of Hollywoodโ€™s silent film era transitioning into talkies. The initial rejection of sound films by many industry veterans mirrored current apprehensions in the crypto space, where innovations like Polygon face skepticism from traditional structures. Just as daring filmmakers seized the moment to reshape cinema, innovators in crypto must push for the recognition and support they need, suggesting that only through collaboration and adaptation can both sides thrive in a rapidly evolving environment.