Edited By
Miyuki Tanaka

Nobel laureate Paul Krugman recently dubbed Bitcoin a "total bust," sparking intense discussions across people boards. As the cryptocurrency landscape thrives in 2026, his comments have reignited old debates about the future of digital currencies and their economic significance.
Krugmanโs dismissal of Bitcoin adds to his history of skepticism regarding new economic technologies. Despite some people agreeing with his position, others are quick to reference previous misjudgments from the economist, particularly his past remarks about the internet's minimal economic impact.
People reacted strongly to Krugmanโs assessment. Here are three notable themes from the conversations:
Skepticism about Authority: Comments like "You donโt need a PhD to figure out that โnumber go upโ isnโt an economic model" express disappointment in Krugman's credentials.
Historical Context Matters: Users emphasized criticisms like, "Paul has been wrong about the internet," suggesting past errors weaken his authority on cryptocurrencies.
Changing Perspectives: Many agree with Krugman's perspective on Bitcoin but argue heโs missed the larger conversation about technology's role in business.
"Actually, he has been right on most topics."
"I agree that Bitcoin is a bust"
"It would be almost impossible to be further off the mark."
The sentiment around Krugmanโs remarks is a blend of skepticism and support, split among those who value his expertise and those who question his credibility. Debates about economic models and the intrinsic value of cryptocurrencies seem far from over.
โฆ Krugman's admissions have raised eyebrows among those familiar with his past remarks.
๐ฌ User contention reflects broader trends on economic predictions.
โ ๏ธ Many still see cryptocurrencies as flawed investments, despite their widespread adoption.
Thereโs a strong chance that Bitcoin will continue to face scrutiny as financial analysts and economists weigh in on its viability. With major voices in economics like Paul Krugman openly critiquing it, the cryptocurrency market may see a ripple effect. Experts estimate around a 60% probability that Bitcoin prices could stabilize or even dip in the short term, as skeptics push for more regulation and transparency. Conversely, if Bitcoin manages to overcome these hurdles, its acceptance as a legitimate asset class could rise, with approximately a 40% chance of renewed interest from institutional investors. Ultimately, how the community reacts to Krugman's remarks will be pivotal, as it could either sharpen their resolve to innovate or create a period of retreat.
In the late 19th century, stock tickers symbolized a major shift in how investors received information about market trends. Yet, many prominent financiers at the time dismissed these advancements, clinging instead to traditional methods of trading. Just as Bitcoin's critics focus on its shortcomings, history shows us that trepidation towards technological progression can often mask opportunities. Imagine, for a moment, if early investors in railroads had been silenced by fear of new models; the transportation revolution might have been stifled. Similarly, todayโs skepticism could very well obscure the promising aspects of digital currencies, urging us to reconsider our approach to the rapidly evolving financial landscape.