Edited By
Marko Petrovic
A growing number of people in the crypto community express concern over the Nomic (Nom) token and its associated Bitcoin bridge. Recent comments indicate a troubling trend of inactivity, with little to no development reported since mid-July 2025.
Nomic was once touted as a bridge for Bitcoin on the Cosmos network, enabling seamless transactions. However, comments from the community suggest that maintenance has fallen to a single developer in the last eight months. One user lamented, "They stopped to develop on it for a long time," reflecting a broader sentiment that the project may be stagnating.
Despite past functionality, including successful deposits and withdrawals of Bitcoin, many folks now regard Nomic with skepticism. "Everyone says itโs dead," admitted one former supporter who recently sold their nBTC.
The lack of updates has led to speculation around the project's viability:
Minimal Development: Only one person has been maintaining the project according to GitHub activity.
Community Sentiment:
Most comments lean toward negativity, with users signaling that it's essentially defunct.
"The fact this question has been asked so many times should tell you something about the value here," noted another commentator, highlighting a lack of engagement from significant figures in the Cosmos ecosystem.
While some maintain the belief that Nomic could see revival, others are far less optimistic.
"NOM is an example of too much hype, and vaporware," one commenter pointedly remarked.
In contrast, there's still activity on GitHub, with various branches indicating that some efforts may continue. However, significant doubts about the overall direction of the project temper this optimism.
๐ "They stopped to develop on it for a long time" - Key sentiment from users.
โ ๏ธ Ongoing concerns about the project's longevity as attention fades.
๐ "Looks like only one person maintaining the network" suggests vulnerability.
As the situation develops, the fate of Nomic hangs in the balance. Can it pivot back to relevance, or is it headed for oblivion? Only time will tell.
Going forward, the likelihood of Nomic regaining its footing appears low, with estimates suggesting a 70% chance it could fade into obscurity if development remains stagnant. The project may survive if the single developer finds new collaborators or inspiration, but skepticism among the community presents significant barriers. Experts note that without regular updates and clearer communication, trust in Nomic is hard to rebuild. If it cannot adapt, it might remain an example of overhyped projects that fail to deliver on promises.
This situation bears a striking resemblance to the rise and fall of the Betamax format in the 1980s. Betamax, once lauded for its superior quality, fell behind VHS due to a lack of support and market engagement. As people gravitated toward VHS for its broader availability and more aggressive marketing, Betamaxโs stagnation became fatal. In Nomicโs case, the parallels are clear: without community support and development momentum, it risks being outpaced by more responsive and innovative projects. Just as VHS became a household name despite its flaws, the rapid evolution of competing solutions may signal Nomic's decline.