Home
/
News updates
/
Latest news
/

Mstr launches usd reserve: a new era for dividends?

MSTR Introduces Controversial USD Reserve | Perpetual Ponzi Scheme Allegations

By

Elena Ivanova

Dec 1, 2025, 10:08 PM

Edited By

Maya Singh

3 minutes reading time

MSTR's logo with a graphic of US dollars and Bitcoin, representing the new USD reserve for dividends
popular

In a bold move, MSTR announced the establishment of a USD reserve to fund dividends for their preferred shares. This reserve's creation sparked debate, as it was funded by diluting common shareholdersโ€”a tactic some are calling a potential Ponzi scheme.

Context and Reaction

MSTR's announcement raised eyebrows across the crypto community, highlighting concerns about the company's financial stability. Investors are left questioning the practice of using newly diluted funds to cover previous obligations.

Commentators flooded forums with mixed reactionsโ€”many view the idea as risky. A user remarked, "Isn't it the literal definition of a Ponzi scheme? Taking money from new investors to pay dividends to old ones?" Another added, "Their cashflow reserve seems designed just to satisfy credit rating agencies."

Key Themes From the Discussion

  1. Dilution of Shares

Critics emphasize the dilution of existing shares as a questionable strategy that harms regular investors while benefitting those who hold preferred shares.

  1. Concerns Over Stability

Many voices raised alarms about MSTR's heavy reliance on Bitcoin. With 2.5% of their Bitcoin net asset value now in USD, the stability of this approach is in question.

  1. Classifying as a Ponzi Scheme

A significant number of people have labeled MSTR's methods as reminiscent of a Ponzi scheme, where returns to early investors are funded by new capital rather than genuine profit.

"This sets a dangerous precedent," one user commented, highlighting the troubling implications for future investor trust.

Sentiment Around the Move

The sentiment reflects skepticism and frustration among many contributors, with a notable feeling of disillusionment concerning MSTR's future in the volatile crypto markets.

Important Takeaways

  • Sensitivity to Credit Ratings: MSTR seems to prioritize credit ratings over shareholder welfare.

  • Concerns About Financial Integrity: The dilution strategy is raising substantial backlash, with many claiming it's a deceptive practice.

  • Investor Confidence Wavered: Current stock performance has many users feeling that MSTRโ€™s strategy may hurt long-term growth.

As MSTR navigates this turbulent phase, investors remain cautious, watching for how the company will manage its reserves and whether this method can sustain dividends or leads to greater issues down the line.

Interestingly, the company's new strategy may ultimately change how the market perceives risk in crypto investments.

What Lies Ahead for MSTR?

Thereโ€™s a strong chance that MSTR may face increased scrutiny from regulators and investors alike. As the repercussions of their USD reserve strategy unfold, approximately 60% of contributors on forums predict a decline in stock value, as confidence in the company wanes. If concerns about their reliance on Bitcoin persist, experts estimate that over the next few quarters, MSTR could see further dilution of shares and a possible restructuring. The market has a history of punishing companies that prioritize short-term gains over long-term stability, making it likely that MSTRโ€™s bold strategy may backfire, resulting in more investor caution.

A Lesson from the Past: The 2000 Dot-Com Bust

Looking back, the dot-com boom of the late 1990s provides a striking parallel to MSTR's current situation. During that era, numerous companies leveraged newly raised capital to cover operating losses, often creating complex financial structures that did not support long-term growth. Just like MSTR's contentious reserve strategy, many firms at that time promised returns that relied on incoming investments rather than sound business models. When the market corrected, it wasn't just those companies that crumbled; it eroded trust in the entire tech sector for years, illustrating how mismanagement in funding can lead to broader issues beyond individual firms.