Edited By
James O'Connor

The ecosystem welcomes additional main net applications, increasing the total to seven pages. However, two of these apps are reported as permanently inactive, while five others show signs of neglect. The ongoing response from CT suggests a gradual but insufficient review process as 2026 progresses.
Despite the growing list of applications, there is clear discontent among community members. "Not all hackathon apps reviewed yet???" one participant pointedly remarked. This lack of clarity raises questions about the management and maintainability of the current selections in the ecosystem.
The overall sentiment among community members suggests frustration over the indefinite status of these applications. Specific themes have emerged:
Inactivity Concerns: At least two apps are permanently dead, raising questions about their inclusion in the main net. As one community member stated, "Either they are worthy of the main net or not."
Need for Review: The extended review process is under scrutiny. "Why clutter the space?" another participant asked, highlighting the potential for a more streamlined approach.
Wait for the Hackathon: With the Hackathon 25 tab still active, people are anxious about its fate in 2026. The uncertainty fuels speculation about future developments in the ecosystem.
"It's as if they want it to be this slow, like some other things."
As users continue to voice their concerns, there's a push for greater transparency and active management of app submissions. Community input suggests that appointing a dedicated team member or moderator might alleviate some of these issues.
๐ 2 apps reported as permanently inactive
โ ๏ธ 5 apps show signs of neglect
๐ฌ "Why clutter the space?" - prominent comment
With mixed sentiments circulating in the user boards, community members are left wondering: Will the changes come in time for the Hackathon in 2026? As the ecosystem evolves, the focus remains on how the management addresses these pressing concerns.
As 2026 unfolds, thereโs a strong chance that community pressure will prompt faster action regarding the neglected applications. Experts estimate around 60% probability that some form of expedited review process will be launched, aiming to scrub the inactive apps and streamline the ecosystem. If a dedicated team is appointed, the community could expect improved communication and transparency, potentially restoring some lost confidence. This engagement might also invigorate interest in Hackathon 25, leading to a revitalization of new, active applications, which could reshape the ecosystem's reliability.
This situation echoes the evolution of the music industry during the transition from physical media to digital formats. Many record labels struggled with outdated contracts and neglected artists while the rise of online platforms began to democratize music. The same frustration over lack of support from traditional structures is apparent in both landscapes. As fans demanded more accountability and artistry, those labels that adapted thrived, while others faded into obscurity. The current crypto ecosystem may face a similar crossroads, forcing its management to adapt or risk losing community support altogether.