Home
/
Security measures
/
Wallet security
/

Ledger nano s plus faces phased out issues

Ledger Nano S Plus | Users Concerned Over Replacement Strategy

By

Diana Kim

May 19, 2025, 06:34 AM

2 minutes reading time

Frustrated users experiencing confirmation problems with Ledger Nano S Plus and Metamask, with visible error messages on the screen.

A segment of the crypto community is expressing frustration as the Ledger Nano S Plus is reportedly being phased out. Many users are questioning the necessity of upgrading their devices, especially since they believe this change limits their options, leading to transaction issues on platforms like Metamask.

Context and Significance

As the 2025 technology landscape evolves, users have noticed that the Ledger Nano S Plus may not function as effectively as before. Issues reported include an inability to process transactions on Metamask, with some users claiming the confirm button remains grayed out, even when they have sufficient tokens for gas fees.

"Trying through different browsers and nothing. Both Ledger and Metamask support lead nowhere."

This is raising alarms among those who rely on this wallet for their digital assets. Users are now debating alternatives and weighing the need to buy new hardware amid ongoing compatibility concerns.

Users' Reactions and Alternative Solutions

The Case for Alternatives

  1. Alternative Wallets: Some users recommend options like Sparrow Wallet for Bitcoin holders.

  2. Investment Queries: Others believe that investing in the Nano S Plus is reasonable if users are involved in Altcoins and DeFi platforms.

  3. Longevity of Previous Models: Comments suggest that older models, like the original Nano S, may still be viable for basic tasks.

"If you dabble in Alts and DeFi, then a Nano S Plus is a trivial investment."

Sentiment Patterns

The sentiment in the community reflects mixed feelings: while many see the value in upgrading, thereโ€™s a strong undercurrent of discontent at being pushed to do so. The feedback indicates a desire for maintaining existing devices without enforced upgrades.

Key Insights

  • ๐Ÿ”„ Users report transaction problems with Metamask and Ledger's support has not been helpful.

  • ๐Ÿ’ก Alternative wallets like Sparrow are being suggested for Bitcoin-only investors.

  • ๐ŸŽฏ "If youโ€™re just holding BTC, then the Nano S should keep working for years to come."

The Bigger Picture

As Ledger phasing out popular devices raises concerns for active crypto traders, many ponder whether this trend signifies a shift in device support strategy within the industry. What does this mean for new investors entering the crypto space? With the rise and fall of various assets, ensuring accessibility to their funds is paramount, making this an issue to watch closely as we move through 2025.

Future Trends in Device Support

As Ledger continues its strategy of phasing out certain products, predictions suggest that around 70% of current users may eventually adapt to newer devices or alternatives in the next 12 to 18 months. This shift might stem from heightened compatibility needs with evolving platforms in the crypto ecosystem. Users leaning toward new hardware options indicates a growing recognition of the importance of seamless transactions, particularly in platforms like Metamask. With the market's rapid change, those who remain with outdated devices could face increasing frustrations, potentially leading to a significant drop in active wallets for Ledger if issues persist.

A Reflection on Technological Shifts

This situation bears a resemblance to the early 2010s when digital cameras faced a similar transformation with the rise of smartphones. At that time, many enthusiasts were hesitant to abandon their dedicated devices, yet steady advancements in smartphone camera technology eventually led to a mass shift. Just as photographers made the difficult choice to migrate from separate cameras to multi-functional phones for convenience, crypto users might soon find themselves navigating the landscape of digital wallets for the benefits of improved functionality, compelling them to reassess long-held loyalty to specific brands.