Edited By
Fatima Zohra

A significant delay looms for the crypto market structure bill as U.S. lawmakers may not advance the crucial legislation until 2027. Political conflicts, particularly over provisions targeting senior officials, are stalling progress on rules that could reshape the industry.
With the political climate heating up ahead of the midterms, it appears that the momentum to regulate the crypto market is waning. Sources indicate that lawmakers initially aimed for passage before the end of 2025, but new concerns have driven the timeline further back.
Some commenters express frustration, with one stating, "If they donโt pass it before midterms, itโs over." There is a palpable sense of urgency among advocates who fear that once the elections hit, chances for significant regulatory action will fade.
The proposed legislation is hindered by proposed conflict-of-interest rules, which would restrict officials and their families from owning crypto businesses. This provision faces considerable pushback, adding layers of complexity to an already convoluted process.
An experienced commentator noted that traditionally, significant policies cannot gain traction in even-numbered years if they haven't passed by April. This might mean that major moves could stall due to internal gridlock.
The sentiment in various forums is decidedly negative regarding the delay:
Skepticism about leadership: "Trump making sure he can still be a criminal even after laws are made."
Frustration over political maneuvering: "Nothing will pass after the midtermsonce they lose a chamber, nothing significant gets done."
User concerns about regulatory implications reflect a broader anxiety over political stability and its impact on the burgeoning crypto market. It raises the question: How will these delays affect the future of digital currency in America?
๐ Lawmakers may push the crypto market structure bill approval to 2027.
โ๏ธ Debate continues over conflict-of-interest rules for senior officials.
๐ฌ "Long live the grift," reflects a prevailing skepticism of the political process.
This developing story will require close monitoring as upcoming elections could significantly influence both the timing and nature of potential legislation.
Experts predict that there's a good chance the crypto market structure bill won't see the light of day until at least 2027. This delay results from both rising political conflicts and strategic hesitations from lawmakers, who are increasingly concerned about their electoral prospects. With midterms approaching, many predict the urgency for robust regulations will dissipate, especially if the current administration changes hands. As internal gridlock continues and the conversation about conflicts of interest remains unresolved, the probability of any significant legislation passing this term is low. If these trends hold, political maneuvering may leave the crypto market in limbo, causing further uncertainty for participants in this rapidly evolving financial landscape.
Looking back to the early 2000s, the debate around telecom regulations offers an intriguing parallel. At that time, policymakers grappled with the impact of burgeoning internet technologies. Legislative action was stalled due to conflicts akin to those now seen with cryptoโwhere the growth of new markets outpaced regulatory frameworks and political will. Just as lawmakers struggled to balance innovation with regulation, today's politicians face similar dilemmas. The ensuing legislative inaction during that era also created an environment ripe for both innovation and confusion, paralleling the current state of the crypto market's uncertain future.