By
Jae Min
Edited By
Fatima Elmansour

A growing wave of skepticism surrounds a crypto project as users express frustration over a year of radio silence. With many feeling let down, questions surface about its future and potential for real value in the market.
Users are voicing their concerns regarding the project's apparent demise, with comments indicating a feeling of betrayal. One user stated, "It was a scam, just like all those other tokens on Coingecko." Others believe that missed opportunities may have contributed to the project's fall.
Claims of a Scam: Many users feel the project was a scam from the beginning. Comments reflect a widespread belief that its lack of transparency and engagement point to dishonesty.
Missed Opportunities: Users highlighted that earlier blockchain implementation could have added value. If the developers had focused on this instead of unnecessary products, the project might have been in a stronger position.
Inability to Trade: Frustration escalates as users recount failed attempts to sell their assets, with one commenting, "Probably can't even sell now honestlyโฆ" Many are left wondering how to move forward.
While some abandon hope, others affirm that the project is still active. "This project is still active and Suresh is building," one user claimed, contradicting the sentiment of abandonment. This sparks confusion among the community.
"Radio silence for a year? Just because you disappeared doesnโt mean that EverRise did."
This sentiment echoes the doubts many hold, yet some cling to the belief that activity continues behind the scenes.
๐ Majority view it as a scam
๐ซ Failed trading attempts reported by users
โ๏ธ Some claim the project is still alive
The lingering doubt and dissatisfaction among users illustrate significant challenges for the project, raising concerns about its capacity to recover and regain trust in an already skeptical community.
As frustration mounts, the Kraken NFT project's trajectory remains uncertain. There's a strong chance that without direct communication or reassurances from the developers, many people will abandon the project. Experts estimate around 60% of current holders may decide to sell at losses to cut their ties, leading to further price drops. However, if a small subset of believers can rally around the project, advocating for renewed development efforts, there could be a 40% probability of revitalization. This could hinge dramatically on strategic partnerships or features that genuinely enhance value and user engagement.
Reflecting on the chaos surrounding the Kraken NFTs evokes the memory of the late 1990s and early 2000s dot-com bubble. Many internet startups, despite glitzy promises, fizzled out as their founders disappeared into obscurity. Yet, a few resilient companies, like Amazon and eBay, emerged stronger from this chaos, proving that with the right adjustments and renewed vision, a project can rebound even after a collapse. Much like these tech pioneers faced skepticism, those still backing Kraken NFTs might find that an unforeseen shift could lead to a new era of value in an unexpected manner.