Home
/
Coin reviews
/
ICO reviews
/

Fluminer t3 bitcoin miner: unimpressive initial review

Fluminer T3 Bitcoin Miner | High Expectations Fall Short

By

Olivier Dubois

Feb 20, 2026, 09:46 PM

Edited By

Linda Wang

3 minutes reading time

Fluminer T3 Bitcoin miner on a desk with visible noise indicators and error messages on the screen

A recent product launch from Fluminer, the T3 Bitcoin miner, is turning heads for all the wrong reasons. Marketed for the home and office, initial hands-on testing reveals performance issues that raise eyebrows among crypto enthusiasts.

First Impressions: What Users Are Saying

Interest in the T3 miner has been met with a blend of excitement and disappointment. Despite being touted as a compact and quiet alternative to the Avalon Q, users have faced significant challenges.

Key Specifications and Performance

  • Hashrate: 115 TH/s

  • Power Consumption: 1700W

  • Efficiency: ~15 J/T (advertised)

While these specs suggest superiority over rivals, users report otherwise. "My normal mode runs at 103TH," lamented one person on a forum. Initial performance measurements highlight discrepancies:

  • In normal mode: 113 TH at 1940W, resulting in an efficiency of ~18 J/T.

Thermal Design and Build Quality

The T3 features a hefty heatsink and six fans, which complicate its usability.

  • The significant heat dissipation design seems promising, but noise levels reach between 59โ€“67 dB, making it unsuitable for typical home environments.

  • Users described it as "significantly louder than other options" like the Avalon Q.

Technical Issues Rise

After 24 hours of operation, the Fluminer T3 displayed an E205 error, prompting concerns about its reliability. "No clear explanation, no obvious fix" is a sentiment echoed across user boards, complicating the product's launch.

Interestingly, while the hardware appears robust, concerns about dynamic power optimization could impact its long-term viability. One user speculated about the source of the chips: "Possibly a JV or special supply agreement?"

User Sentiment: A Mixed Bag

The overall response can best be described as skeptical:

"Great honest review! Looks like a complete flop happy I didnโ€™t wait and got Avalon Q instead."

However, optimism lingers regarding future updates. "We are hoping Fluminer fixes the issues they are aware of it," noted one commenter, suggesting potential for improvement after a firmware patch.

Key Takeaways

  • ๐Ÿ’ฅ Many users report lower efficiency compared to advertised claims

  • ๐Ÿ”‡ T3 is louder than expected, limiting its practical home use

  • โš ๏ธ Persistent technical issues, including E205 errors, dominate user discussions

Overall, the Fluminer T3 has potential but currently struggles to meet expectations. As users await a firmware update post-Chinese New Year, many are turning back to trusted options like the Avalon Q.

Expectations for the Fluminer T3's Future

Moving forward, thereโ€™s a strong chance that Fluminer will issue a firmware update soon, addressing the efficiency discrepancies and reducing noise levels. As the market reacts, expectations are that early adopters will see improvements within the next few monthsโ€”experts estimate around a 60% likelihood of meaningful enhancements post-release. Meanwhile, if the company fails to act promptly, many might revert to well-regarded models like the Avalon Q, which could lead to a decline in Fluminerโ€™s reputation. The situation suggests that the initial hype surrounding the T3 could quickly turn to caution in the crypto community.

A Lesson from the Past's Tech Rollouts

Consider the early days of smartphone innovation: the initial release of certain flagship models often disappointed users due to software bugs or hardware flaws. For instance, the introduction of the first iPhone faced major battery issues, yet Apple transformed these setbacks into valuable lessons, leading to future models that acclaimed the market. The saga of the Fluminer T3 mirrors this sentimentโ€”while it stumbles initially, thereโ€™s always a chance for redemption and potential growth, much like how the smartphone industry evolved through trials and errors.