Home
/
News updates
/
Regulatory changes
/

Unmasking the genius, clarity, and ass acts: a financial trap

Financial Controversy | New Laws Attempt to Shuffle America's $36 Trillion Debt

By

Lucas Mรผller

Jul 21, 2025, 05:37 AM

2 minutes reading time

A visual representation of key financial acts, including GENIUS, CLARITY, and ASS, highlighting their implications on America's economy and debt.
popular

A coalition focused on financial reform is raising eyebrows over the recent passage of three bills aimed at supporting U.S. stablecoins. Critics argue these measures could transfer financial risks while inflating Americaโ€™s national debt burden.

Understanding the GENIUS Act, CLARITY Act, and ASS Act

Recently, the Senate passed laws targeting stablecoins, intending to harness their potential while addressing the national debt crisis. The GENIUS Act mandates stablecoin issuers back their coins with U.S. Treasury securities. This legislation, approved with a 68-30 vote, promises to inject demand into T-bills but raises concerns over potential debt dependency.

With the CLARITY Act, lawmakers are attempting to clarify the regulatory landscape for cryptocurrencies, which some see as an invitation for more financial instability. As one observer put it, "This sets a dangerous precedent."

"If these stablecoins crash, youโ€™re left with worthless digital coins," another commentator warned about the risks involved.

Finally, the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act effectively blocks a government-controlled digital currency, redirecting the landscape toward private companies. This move is seen by some as deflecting risks from the government onto individuals and businesses.

Key Issues Surrounding the Legislation

Debt Implications

  • The U.S. is reportedly pushing forward with a staggering $36 trillion in debt.

  • Critics predict that tying stablecoins to T-bills could mask underlying economic issues.

Regulatory Confusion

  • The CLARITY Act aims to streamline regulations but may inadvertently allow for riskier financial activities.

  • Observers note that eliminating red tape could lead to more financial disasters rather than protection.

The Customer Impact

  • Many are concerned about what happens if these stablecoins fail. As one commenter pointed out, "It's like lending your buddy $100 for a โ€˜sure thingโ€™ investment, only to find out he spent it on beer."

  • The bills might pose hidden risks for everyday people who rely on stablecoins for transactions.

Key Takeaways

  • ๐ŸŽฏ $1.5 trillion projected demand for T-bills tied to stablecoin issuance.

  • ๐Ÿ“‰ "Companies like Circle and Tether are already gearing up to buy T-bills."

  • โš ๏ธ If stablecoins fail, the government could profit, leaving users holding the bag.

The passage of these bills signals a powerful shift in financial legislation. As tension between financial stability and innovation grows, only time will tell if these laws will ultimately protect or hinder American economic interests.

What does this mean for the future of cryptocurrency in the U.S.?

What Lies Ahead for U.S. Cryptocurrency Regulation

Experts predict a significant rise in demand for T-bills tied to stablecoins, estimating a projected influx of $1.5 trillion. This could ease some financial pressures but might also deepen U.S. debt dependency. There's a strong chance that people will turn to these digital assets for everyday transactions, leading to a potential boom in their market. However, if stablecoins falter, the financial fallout could disproportionately affect consumers, leaving them vulnerable as companies profit at their expense. Stakeholders are watching closely, and many anticipate heated debates in Congress over the appropriateness of these measures as economic realities unfold.

A Surprising Historical Echo

In the 1920s, the rise of the automobile industry reshaped American society, yet it also came with significant risks. Manufacturers pushed boundaries, creating innovative vehicles that ultimately stressed highway safety regulations. Similar to todayโ€™s crypto legislation, there was a rush to embrace innovation while regulatory frameworks lagged behind. This moment in history served as a cautionary tale about embracing progress without sufficient oversightโ€”a parallel that may resonate as the financial landscape shifts amid these new laws around stablecoins.