By
Jae Min
Edited By
Jessica Lin

A significant player in the Ethereum layer 2 scene, Blast, is closing its doors after peaking at $2.24 billion in total value locked (TVL) in June 2024. Recent reports indicate the network earned a mere $110 in chain revenue over the past day, sparking discussions within the crypto community about the viability of L2 projects.
Ethereumโs popularity has secured its position in the crypto world, leading many to question the necessity of layer 2 networks. Comments reflect sentiments ranging from frustration to caution, with some observers arguing, "A chain can attract billions through incentives, but sustaining that capital requires real users."
Despite its impressive initial capital, Blast failed to translate TVL into sustained economic activity, raising eyebrows among industry watchers. The current drop to daily revenues of just $110 raises questions about what went wrong. A commentator noted this stark contrast, emphasizing the difference between attracting funds and maintaining user engagement.
"The revenue-to-peak-capital contrast is pretty striking," noted a user.
Concerns regarding the shutdown have prompted a wave of reactions:
Skepticism about decentralization: One user questioned, "How can a decentralized project shut down? Who decided that?"
The future of L2s: Comments suggest that Ethereum will still thrive without relying on L2s, with one observer stating, "Ethereum is fine with that offer just being out there."
Critique on incentives: Some believe that the reliance on farming and speculation creates an unsustainable environment, as shown by Blastโs recent revenue issues.
โก "Real users and meaningful applications matter most." - User commentary on sustainable growth.
๐จ Daily revenue at $110 showcases the gap between hype and reality.
โ๏ธ "Incentives can attract funds, but what happens when they disappear?"
With the ongoing developments in the crypto space, how will this impact other L2 projects? Only time will tell.
The fallout from Blastโs unexpected closure may lead to significant shifts within the layer 2 landscape. Experts estimate thereโs a strong chance that other L2 projects will reassess their revenue models to ensure sustainability. As more projects experience similar struggles, we could see a consolidation in the market, where only those with solid user engagement and practical applications remain viable. Additionally, fresh regulations may prompt some projects to adjust their strategies to comply. If these shifts occur, it might lead to greater stability, with a probability of around 65% that we will see improved user experiences and long-term growth initiatives emerge in the coming months.
Comparing this situation to the dot-com bubble of the late 90s reveals intriguing insights. Many companies back then attracted massive investments based solely on hype without a strong user base or clear business models. As the bubble burst, those able to pivotโlike Amazon which shifted to a user-centric approachโcame out stronger. Just as Blast's failure mirrors that overreliance on capital without lasting engagement, we may witness a similar sifting process among L2 networks. Those that remain will need to adapt and innovate, akin to tech companies that emerged wiser and more resilient post-bubble.