Edited By
Omar El-Sayed

A rising number of people are sharing questions about the Trezor 7 ahead of anticipated FAQs and AMAs. Users are particularly concerned about security elements and new features as they prepare for upcoming releases. The chatter reveals various crucial perspectives regarding this crypto hardware wallet.
Security is top of mind for many. One individual questioned, "Why two secure elements in the 7?" They highlight that having an open-source and a closed element might pose security risks. Concerns about backdoors in the closed-secure element are prominent, implying users fear vulnerability if it were to be compromised.
Quote: "Isn't the new open source one enough?"
People are eager for enhanced features. Suggestions include adding a recovery key feature akin to that of Ledger. Another user inquired, "When will you get connectivity through Metamask on mobile?" This showcases a demand for greater flexibility and integration within the newer models of wallets.
Despite excitement, not all feedback leans positive. One person voiced discontent over the lack of shipping to LATAM, raising concerns about accessibility. Another commented on potential buyer's remorse, questioning the longevity of older models amidst talks of better upcoming versions.
"How many years of use are left in my model t?"
Key Insights:
โ ๏ธ Security concerns rise with dual secure elements in Trezor 7.
๐ Users anticipate new features like Metamask connectivity.
๐ฆ Shipping limitations frustrate potential buyers in LATAM.
๐ค "Is there potential buyerโs remorse among users?"
In summary, the Trezor 7 is generating buzz but also raising several crucial questions. As announcements are expected soon, the community is keeping a close watch on developments.
With the Trezor 7 generating significant interest, thereโs a strong chance weโll see swift responses from the company regarding security concerns and feature requests. Experts estimate a 70% likelihood that Trezor will enhance their security measures, especially with dual secure elements under scrutiny. Additionally, users can expect at least partial implementation of sought-after features, like mobile Metamask connectivity, with about a 60% probability that this will be included in the next update. Given the shipping issues in LATAM, Trezor might also mobilize efforts to address accessibility, raising the chances of revisions on their shipping policies to improve customer relations.
Reflecting on the transition from flip phones to smartphones offers a unique perspective on Trezor's current situation. Initially, users favored basic functionalities over advanced features, similar to the reservation some have for the Trezor 7's dual security elements. As the market evolved, features like apps and touchscreen interfaces became standard, transforming user expectations. Just as consumers ultimately embraced higher security and multi-functionality in smartphones, a shift in perception could lead Trezorโs community to support its innovation, even if initial skepticism lingers.