Edited By
David Thompson

A major shake-up in Dutch finance emerged as Nathalie van Berkel, nominated to oversee a controversial 36% tax on unrealized crypto gains, resigned following revelations of discrepancies in her educational background. The timing of the scandal has raised eyebrows, particularly since the new tax law is set to launch in 2028.
With the resignation, the future of a tax plan that aims to tax unrealized capital gains on various assets, especially cryptocurrencies, is now in jeopardy. People across the Netherlands are reacting strongly. "This tax will rip apart peopleโs stocks and shares investment portfolios," one commenter argued.
Another user shared a personal anecdote about being taxed on winnings in professional poker, highlighting how this could become a widespread issue affecting many.
Discontent among the people is palpable:
Financial Implications: Many are worried about how this tax will impact their investments. "It's going to tear apart people's portfolios in Holland."
Political Accountability: Users are frustrated over politicians misrepresenting themselves to gain positions of power. "That same person decided it was a good idea to fabricate their credentials so thereโs that."
Integrity of Tax Policy: The integrity of the proposed tax laws is under fire. Comments called into question the effectiveness and fairness of taxing unrealized gains, likely expanding this tax to various assets, including houses.
"Youโll own nothing and be happy" - This sentiment reflects growing skepticism toward expectation of tax fairness.
๐ The upcoming tax on unrealized gains could negatively affect investment strategies for many.
๐จ "Itโs always the same with the corrupted EU politicians," a commenter voiced, highlighting widespread distrust in leadership.
๐ People fear that lofty tax rates will drive them to seek alternatives abroad, as seen with some moving their businesses to Switzerland.
As the government navigates the fallout from van Berkel's resignation, questions linger about who will take charge of this critical role. Will the next nominee restore public trust in the nation's financial oversight?
The fallout from Nathalie van Berkel's resignation likely means the government will face delays in implementing the 36% tax on unrealized crypto gains, pushing its anticipated start in 2028 closer to uncertainty. Thereโs a strong chance that the Dutch finance ministry will appoint a new nominee who may have a clean slate, but public trust could take a long time to rebuild. Experts estimate around 60-70% of people fear this tax could prompt some to move their investments abroad, possibly leading to a decline in domestic economic growth. With growing dissent about financial policies, there's considerable pressure on lawmakers to reevaluate proposed tax strategies and prioritize transparency.
A lesser-known parallel can be found in the corporate fallout of the late 1990s dot-com bubble. Just as now, when inflated claims led to a trust crisis, many tech companies went bust due to misaligned expectations and misrepresented performance. The public, once eager to invest, turned wary, reflecting a cultural shift in how financial responsibility is perceived. Todayโs skepticism could be viewed through this same lens, suggesting that if the government fails to address these integrity issues, it may face a similar withdrawal of public faith that could jeopardize future tax initiatives.