By
Jae Min
Edited By
Linda Wang

Telegram's founder Pavel Durov stirs controversy by announcing plans to become the lead validator for TON, igniting a swift price spike for Toncoin. However, critics are raising eyebrows as the price starts to tumble once again, leading many to question Durov's true motives.
From May 4 to May 7, Toncoin's market value surged, doubling its market cap. Yet, by May 24, the cryptocurrency plummeted, shedding 40% of its gains in just three weeks. Durov made headlines again on June 1 with the announcement of a rebrandingโToncoin would revert to its original name, Gram.
Despite the hype, the rebranding produced only a weak market response. Notably, investors had previously purchased $1.7 billion worth of Gram, which they received back after a settlement with the SEC due to the ICO's violations of securities laws.
Durov's timing is pivotal. The SEC's three-year notification period, linked to its 2020 settlement, ended in June 2023. By assuming a validation role and renaming Toncoin, Durov navigates around legal restrictions.
One user pointedly remarked, "How can this be done if the project remains the same?" Such questions loom large as stakeholders scrutinize the implications of these recent moves.
Interestingly, Durovโs slogan, "Make TON Great Again," seems to imply that attitudes toward cryptocurrency have changed under Donald Trumpโs administration. However, some observers claim only projects favoring the presidentโs family business see real support.
Skepticism on Intent: Many point out that the crypto scene is rife with schemes, with one commenter stating, "If it involves crypto and blockchain, itโs likely a pump-and-dump."
Durov's Strategy Questioned: Some users express doubts over Durovโs actions: "Is he misreading the landscape?"
Frustration with Regulation: Concerns grow regarding regulatory dynamics, especially after the SEC's recent court ruling limiting the ICO's legality.
"This all seems like kabuki theater for a bunch of oligarchs clobbering each other," shared a skeptic.
๐ Toncoinโs value jumped, but quickly fell back down by 40%.
โ๏ธ Durov cleverly skirts the law exploiting expired SEC conditions.
๐ฐ Investors received back the $1.7 billion after the SEC ruling.
As the crypto world continues to evolve, Durov's actions will undoubtedly spark further discussions.
Can Gram truly thrive under the current framework, or is it merely a flash in the pan? Only time will tell.
There's a strong chance that Gram might face significant hurdles ahead, particularly as the crypto space continues to evolve under stricter regulations. Experts estimate there's around a 60% probability that Durov's strategies may result in temporary gains only to be overshadowed by intensified scrutiny from regulators, especially with the SEC monitoring the situation closely. As the market reacts to these developments, investor confidence may sway, leading to price instability. Furthermore, if the public sentiment remains skeptical about Durovโs motives, it could hamper long-term adoption, making it challenging for Gram to regain its footing despite its rebranding efforts.
Interestingly, the current situation mirrors the dot-com bubble in the late 90s. Many companies with innovative ideas struggled to sustain momentum after initial hype. Just like Durov seeks to revitalize Gram, numerous tech firms attempted rebranding and pivoting strategies to convince investors they had lasting value. In both scenarios, ambition clashed with reality, leading to unforeseen downturns. This kind of transformation, marked by high stakes and sharp declines, reminds us how quickly fortunes can change in a rapidly evolving landscape.