Home
/
News updates
/
Latest news
/

Ton vs gram: durov's bold move sparks controversy

TON vs GRAM | Durov Allegedly Executes Surge and Plummet Scheme

By

Jae Min

Jun 3, 2026, 06:28 PM

Edited By

Linda Wang

3 minutes reading time

Pavel Durov speaking at a conference about new plans for TON and the rebranding to Gram, with investors looking concerned in the audience.

Telegram's founder Pavel Durov stirs controversy by announcing plans to become the lead validator for TON, igniting a swift price spike for Toncoin. However, critics are raising eyebrows as the price starts to tumble once again, leading many to question Durov's true motives.

Recent Surge and Subsequent Drop

From May 4 to May 7, Toncoin's market value surged, doubling its market cap. Yet, by May 24, the cryptocurrency plummeted, shedding 40% of its gains in just three weeks. Durov made headlines again on June 1 with the announcement of a rebrandingโ€”Toncoin would revert to its original name, Gram.

Despite the hype, the rebranding produced only a weak market response. Notably, investors had previously purchased $1.7 billion worth of Gram, which they received back after a settlement with the SEC due to the ICO's violations of securities laws.

Legal Loopholes and Regulatory Concerns

Durov's timing is pivotal. The SEC's three-year notification period, linked to its 2020 settlement, ended in June 2023. By assuming a validation role and renaming Toncoin, Durov navigates around legal restrictions.

One user pointedly remarked, "How can this be done if the project remains the same?" Such questions loom large as stakeholders scrutinize the implications of these recent moves.

Shifting Sands of Crypto

Interestingly, Durovโ€™s slogan, "Make TON Great Again," seems to imply that attitudes toward cryptocurrency have changed under Donald Trumpโ€™s administration. However, some observers claim only projects favoring the presidentโ€™s family business see real support.

What Do People Think?

  1. Skepticism on Intent: Many point out that the crypto scene is rife with schemes, with one commenter stating, "If it involves crypto and blockchain, itโ€™s likely a pump-and-dump."

  2. Durov's Strategy Questioned: Some users express doubts over Durovโ€™s actions: "Is he misreading the landscape?"

  3. Frustration with Regulation: Concerns grow regarding regulatory dynamics, especially after the SEC's recent court ruling limiting the ICO's legality.

"This all seems like kabuki theater for a bunch of oligarchs clobbering each other," shared a skeptic.

Key Insights

  • ๐Ÿš€ Toncoinโ€™s value jumped, but quickly fell back down by 40%.

  • โš–๏ธ Durov cleverly skirts the law exploiting expired SEC conditions.

  • ๐Ÿ’ฐ Investors received back the $1.7 billion after the SEC ruling.

Looking Ahead

As the crypto world continues to evolve, Durov's actions will undoubtedly spark further discussions.

Can Gram truly thrive under the current framework, or is it merely a flash in the pan? Only time will tell.

Future Directions for Gram and TON

There's a strong chance that Gram might face significant hurdles ahead, particularly as the crypto space continues to evolve under stricter regulations. Experts estimate there's around a 60% probability that Durov's strategies may result in temporary gains only to be overshadowed by intensified scrutiny from regulators, especially with the SEC monitoring the situation closely. As the market reacts to these developments, investor confidence may sway, leading to price instability. Furthermore, if the public sentiment remains skeptical about Durovโ€™s motives, it could hamper long-term adoption, making it challenging for Gram to regain its footing despite its rebranding efforts.

Echoes from the Dot-Com Bubble

Interestingly, the current situation mirrors the dot-com bubble in the late 90s. Many companies with innovative ideas struggled to sustain momentum after initial hype. Just like Durov seeks to revitalize Gram, numerous tech firms attempted rebranding and pivoting strategies to convince investors they had lasting value. In both scenarios, ambition clashed with reality, leading to unforeseen downturns. This kind of transformation, marked by high stakes and sharp declines, reminds us how quickly fortunes can change in a rapidly evolving landscape.