Edited By
James OโReilly

A new closed loop DeFi protocol is raising eyebrows as it claims to address four significant pain points in crypto. While the innovative fee redistribution model promises rewards for users, debates about its sustainability are heating up among community members.
Under this protocol, 80% of service fees would go back to users, creating a feedback loop of sorts. However, the catch is that the last participant would receive only 75% of their fee if no new users joined the platform. This mechanism has sparked conversations about whether such a model can genuinely provide value in the long run.
Some community members question whether this fee structure is viable. "The latest person only gets 75% back if thereโs zero activity," one comment noted, emphasizing a need for ongoing transactions. Another participant stated, "The structure is essentially a redistribution scheme; itโs not sustainable without ongoing growth."
Sustainability Concerns: Many believe that the model relies too much on new participants for survival.
Value of Service: Skepticism exists over whether the service can attract users without heavy reliance on fee redistribution.
Bitcoin Comparison Dissected: Critics point out that unlike Bitcoin, which provides value independent of new buyers, this protocolโs viability hinges on continuous new user onboarding.
"If the service is truly valuable, users would pay without needing 80% redistribution," a commenter argued, calling for a more straightforward fee model.
๐ 80% of fees are returned to all users, but sustainability hinges on new activity.
โ ๏ธ Skepticism rising: Many question if it can be taken seriously.
๐ฌ "Users need to pay for value, not simply for redistribution," adds a community member.
As the discussions unfold, the scalability of this closed loop model remains unclear. Will it attract enough users to maintain its promises, or does it risk becoming yet another unsustainable scheme in the fast-paced crypto world? Only time will tell.
Experts estimate thereโs a strong chance the closed loop DeFi protocol could either flourish or face challenges within the next year. If it can successfully engage enough participants and maintain an active community, the 80% fee redistribution may lead to a steady user base and potential growth. However, should interest wane or competition intensify, the model might collapse under its own weight. Many believe the sustainability of this framework hinges on real-world usability and the protocolโs ability to prove its value beyond the current model, which might further influence its long-term success.
This situation draws a fascinating parallel to early multi-level marketing schemes that promised wealth through recruitment. Initially, many found success as new participants entered the fold; however, once the influx slowed, the entire operation imploded. Just as the appeal of those marketing models diminished when the underlying value wasnโt tangible, this closed loop DeFi protocol faces similar risks. The history of these schemes illustrates that reliance on perpetual growth without a solid product can eventually lead to a sharp decline, highlighting the importance of value over mere transactions.