Home
/
Market analysis
/
Crypto trends
/

Bitcoin's imperfect store of value: how whales navigate it

Bitcoin's Elusive Future | A Vault for the Few?

By

Elena Vasilyeva

Oct 4, 2025, 10:19 PM

Edited By

Andrei Petrov

3 minutes reading time

An illustration showing large whales swimming among small fish, symbolizing how Bitcoin is controlled by a few big players while many struggle to get a share.
popular

A growing skepticism surrounds Bitcoin's promise as a store of value. Critics argue that instead of being a currency for the average person, it serves mainly the interests of whales and big players. With the impending fluctuations and questions about its true utility, many are left to wonder: is it time to rethink our approach to Bitcoin?

The Numbers Speak

According to sources, Bitcoin's total supply stands at 21 million, but

  • 4.2 million BTC are permanently lost,

  • 6.5 million BTC are hoarded by just 14 whales,

  • leaving only 10.3 million BTC for the global population of nearly 8 billion. This amounts to approximately 1/8000th of a Bitcoin per person.

That's barely enough for a cup of coffee!

Whales Control the Helm

"Those whales will never let it fail since they have so heavily bought into it," commented a supporter on a forum. Indeed, big players like MicroStrategy and Trump Media are doubling down:

  • MicroStrategy holds 640,031 BTC but funded their investments through debt, raising concerns about sustainability.

  • Trump Media boasts $2 billion in Bitcoin, controlling 80% of the TRUMP meme coin.

Their positions exacerbate a central issue: masses buy Bitcoin not from the protocol itself, but from these whales, often at inflated prices and terms dictated by them.

The Value Question

While Bitcoin is branded as a solution to fiat's flaws, it lacks key features:

  • No yield.

  • No recovery if stolen.

  • Limited practical use.

In contrast, fiat allows for earning interest through various avenues, offering flexibility and utility.

A Performance for the Few

"Bitcoin is not a store of value for the masses," stated a commentator against its speculative allure.

Instead, it's portrayed as a performance of sovereignty benefiting a select group. This sentiment is echoed throughout cryptocurrency boards, where many remain optimistic despite the risks:

  • "I know with my bags I will be retiring off the yield in my 40s," one user claimed confidently.

Sentiment Analysis

The mixed responses highlight a vital conflict:

  • Many remain firmly in favor, expressing belief in Bitcoin's potential as "digital gold" even amid warnings.

  • Critics argue against the myth of sustainability and call for the masses to walk away, emphasizing the concentration of wealth among a few.

"Youโ€™re not securing your future; youโ€™re crowning the 14 whales," warned a seasoned forum contributor.

Key Insights

  • โš–๏ธ 80% of Bitcoin is held by 14 whales, raising questions about distribution fairness.

  • ๐Ÿ’ฌ โ€œJust a vault for the few,โ€ say critics who urge caution.

  • ๐Ÿ’ต Traditional fiat offers security and flexibility that Bitcoin cannot match.

As the cryptocurrency market evolves, the debate around Bitcoinโ€™s true value and accessibility is more crucial than ever. Only time will tell if the masses will embrace it or watch it remain a vault for the powerful.

What's Next for Bitcoin?

Experts anticipate a shift in Bitcoin's landscape over the next few years. There's a strong chance that increasing regulatory scrutiny will prompt many to reconsider their investments. Predictions suggest that if Bitcoinโ€™s utility doesn't become clear to the average person, we may see a decrease in mainstream adoption, estimated at around 25% by 2027. Furthermore, with growing frustration among smaller investors over the wealth concentration held by whales, initiatives for alternative cryptocurrencies could arise, leading to a potential fragmentation of the market. This could shift both perception and value dynamically as more people explore options that promise better distribution opportunities.

A Historical Echo in Innovation

Consider the early days of the smartphone revolution in the mid-2000s. Initially, the technology was dominated by a few major players, leading many to question its accessibility and relevance outside tech circles. Yet, as small-scale developers began to innovate and democratize app creation, the sector exploded. Similarly, Bitcoin's current scenario reflects the tension between its elitist grip and the hope for broader access; just as smartphones evolved to empower everyday users, thereโ€™s a possibility that the same may happen in the crypto space โ€” something that could reshape perceptions long held by critics and supporters alike.