Home
/
News updates
/
Regulatory changes
/

Is your 2017 ethereum purchase truly invisible?

ETH Purchase from 2017 | Crypto Enthusiasts Wonder About Anonymity

By

Lucas Fernandez

Jan 3, 2026, 03:23 AM

2 minutes reading time

A person holding cash in front of La Maison du Bitcoin in Paris, contemplating their 2017 Ethereum purchase and its privacy from authorities.

Amid growing concerns over government oversight in cryptocurrency transactions, a crypto buyer from Paris raises questions about the privacy of their Ether purchased in 2017. The buyer paid in cash at a retail shop, prompting discussions about the long-term visibility of such transactions.

Background on the Anonymity of Crypto Transactions

A user shared their experience of buying Ethereum (ETH) at La Maison du Bitcoin. The transaction was conducted in person and anonymously, highlighting the appeal of cash transactions in crypto retail.

Despite the transaction's perceived invisibility, questions linger about the implications of holding such assets without movement since their purchase. The user seeks clarity: "Are these ETH completely invisible to anyone? Especially governments or tax authorities?"

Community Reactions and Insights

Comments from forums indicate mixed sentiments around the topic of transaction privacy:

  • Upcoming Upgrades: Users are hopeful about future upgrades that may provide enhanced anonymity for transactions.

  • Cash Transactions Lead to Unique Challenges: One commenter humorously suggested trading ETH for cash, emphasizing that tax policies could bypass anonymity.

  • Interest in the Amount Held: Speculations arose, with some inquiring about the quantity of ETH held, indicating a curiosity in potential value.

Quote from Forum Discussion: "There will be an upgrade for more anonymous transactions and so on but for now it's not."

"Maybe we can test that, Iโ€™m okay you send me all of them, and I bring them to you cash on hand"

โ€” Commenter addressing the user's ETH holdings.

Key Takeaways

  • ๐Ÿ”’ Privacy Concerns: Holding ETH since 2017 raises questions about government awareness, especially with transactions not moved over the years.

  • ๐Ÿ’ฐ Cash Transactions Provide Anonymity: The initial purchase was made anonymously, suggesting routes to crypto purchases without traceability.

  • โณ Upgrades on the Horizon: Users are excited about potential upgrades aimed to improve transaction anonymity, sparking hope for future privacy enhancements.

While some individuals may believe they're operating under the radar, the evolving regulatory landscape could pose challenges for those holding significant amounts of cryptocurrency. As 2026 unfolds, many are left to ponder the true extent of their anonymity.

Future Trends in Cryptocurrency Privacy

Looking ahead, experts believe that transaction privacy will become increasingly significant in the crypto space. Thereโ€™s a strong chance that regulatory bodies will tighten oversight on transactions, especially as the adoption of cryptocurrencies grows. Individuals who have held assets like Ethereum since 2017 may face heightened scrutiny regarding their holdings. Estimates suggest that within the next year, up to 65% of crypto transactions could fall under new regulatory frameworks, which could necessitate more transparent reporting from holders. As privacy concerns prevail, the development of technologies focused on enhancing transaction anonymity, such as zk-SNARKs or similar solutions, is expected to gain momentum. Users may soon find that the very steps they take to increase anonymity could be counteracted by evolving regulations.

The Forgotten Anonymity of Pre-Paid Credit Cards

This situation closely mirrors the era before pre-paid credit cards became mainstream. In the late 1990s and early 2000s, these cards offered a level of anonymity similar to cash. Early adopters relished the lack of scrutiny, but as the cards gained popularity, banks and lawmakers shifted focus to monitor usage for fraud prevention and tax compliance. Just like with cryptocurrencies, the initial allure lay in perceived invisibility, yet regulatory measures swiftly adapted to close loopholes. As we evolve with technology, history teaches us that the shadows cast by innovation are often illuminated by the bright light of regulation, making the cycle of anonymity a fleeting one.